COMMISSIONS

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

Following a request from the charities listed below to have their status as a charity revoked, the following notice of intention to revoke was sent:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(a) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette.”

TERRY DE MARCH
Director General
Charities Directorate

[34-1-o]

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

Following a request from the charities listed below to have their status as a charity revoked, the following notice of intention to revoke was sent:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(a) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette.”

TERRY DE MARCH
Director General
Charities Directorate

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Model class screening report — Routine Projects in National Park Communities — Public notice

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) re-declares the report titled Routine Projects in National Park Communities to be a model class screening report (MCSR) pursuant to the provisions of subsection 19(1) and paragraph 19(2)(b) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act).

Public consultations on the MCSR took place from July 20 to August 3, 2009. The Agency received one written submission from the public concerning the MCSR. In making the declaration proposed by Parks Canada Agency, the Agency has reviewed the MCSR and has determined the project screening process, as described in the document, meets the requirements of the Act for the environmental assessment of this particular class of projects. It is also the Agency’s opinion that the class of projects described in the MCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.

The declaration is effective August 11, 2009, and is subject to the following terms and conditions:

• Subject to subsection 19(8) of the Act, the declaration is valid until July 30, 2014;
• Parks Canada will notify the Agency, in writing, a minimum of six months prior to the date on which the declaration expires, of its intention either to re-declare the MCSR, or not to re-declare the MCSR and thereby allow the declaration to expire; and
• Parks Canada and the Agency will ensure the MCSR is made available to the public in accordance with the requirements of the Act. Therefore, Parks Canada will place the MCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the Registry). On a quarterly basis, Parks Canada will also post on the Registry Internet site, at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca, a statement of the projects for which the MCSR was applied, as required under the Act. The quarterly schedule for posting on the Registry Internet site is contained in the addendum to the MCSR.

For further information, the public may contact the Class Screening Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, 613-960-0277 or 1-866-582-1884 (telephone), 613-957-0946 (fax), ClassScreening@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DETERMINATION

Custodial operations and related services

Notice is hereby given that, after completing its inquiry, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) made a determination (File No. PR-2008-063) on August 10, 2009, with respect to a complaint filed by Service d’entretien JDH Inc. (JDH), of Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec, under subsection 30.11(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, R.S.C. 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 47, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. EF053-091182/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services. The solicitation was for the provision of janitorial services.

JDH alleged that its proposal was improperly evaluated.

Having examined the evidence presented by the parties and considered the provisions of the Agreement on Internal Trade, the North American Free Trade Agreement, the Agreement on Government Procurement and the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, the Tribunal determined that the complaint was valid.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Ottawa, August 10, 2009

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

EXPIRY OF FINDING

Laminate flooring

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice, pursuant to subsection 76.03(2) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), that its finding made on June 16, 2005, in Inquiry No. NQ-2004-006, concerning laminate flooring in thickness ranging from 5.5 mm to 13 mm (other than laminate hardwood flooring where the hardwood component exceeds 2 mm in thickness) originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China and France and the subsidizing of such product originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China, is scheduled to expire (Expiry No. LE-2009-001) on June 15, 2010. Under SIMA, findings of injury or threat of injury and the associated special protection in the form of anti-dumping or countervailing duties expire five years from the date of the last order or finding, unless an expiry review has been initiated before that date.

Any firm, organization, person or government wishing to participate as a party in these proceedings must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before August 27, 2009. Each counsel who intends to represent a party in these proceedings must also file a notice of representation with the Secretary on or before August 27, 2009. Qualified counsel who wish to have access to any confidential documents filed in these proceedings must file their notices of representation, declarations and undertakings, as well as the notices of participation signed by the parties that they represent, by the same date.

Parties requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review of the said finding shall file 20 copies of written public submissions containing relevant information, opinions and arguments with the Secretary of the Tribunal no later than August 31, 2009. Parties should endeavour to base their submissions on public information; however, confidential information relevant to the issues before the Tribunal may be filed, if necessary, along with a comprehensive public summary or edited version thereof.

Submissions shall include evidence, e.g. documents and sources that support the factual statements in the submissions, and argument concerning all relevant factors, including

• the likelihood of continued or resumed dumping and subsidizing of the goods;
• the likely volume and price ranges of dumped and subsidized imports if dumping and subsidizing were to continue or resume;
• the domestic industry’s recent performance (data for the past three years and for the most recent interim period), including supporting data and statistics showing trends in production, sales, market share, domestic prices, costs and profits;
• the likelihood of injury to the domestic industry if the finding were allowed to expire, having regard to the anticipated effects of a continuation or resumption of dumped and subsidized imports on the industry’s future performance;
• any other developments affecting, or likely to affect, the performance of the domestic industry;
• changes in circumstances, domestically or internationally, including changes in the supply of or demand for the goods, and changes in trends in, and sources of, imports into Canada; and
• any other matter that is relevant.

Where there are opposing views, each party that filed a submission in response to the notice of expiry will be given an opportunity to respond in writing to the representations of other parties. In these circumstances, the Tribunal will distribute copies of the public submissions to each party that filed a submission with the Tribunal. Confidential submissions will be distributed by the Tribunal only to those counsel who have filed undertakings. Parties wishing to respond to the submissions must do so no later than September 15, 2009.

An expiry review at the request of any firm, organization, person or government will not be initiated unless the Tribunal decides that there is sufficient information to indicate that it is warranted.

The Tribunal will issue a decision on September 30, 2009, on whether an expiry review is warranted. If the Tribunal decides that a review is not warranted, the finding will expire on its scheduled expiry date. The Tribunal will issue its reasons no later than 15 days after its decision. If the Tribunal decides to initiate a review, it will issue a notice of expiry review.

The Tribunal’s Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews can be found on its Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca. In addition to providing more detailed information on the proceeding whereby the Tribunal determines if an expiry review is warranted, the draft guideline explains how an expiry review is conducted if the Tribunal determines that one is warranted. In an expiry review, the President of the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) first determines whether the expiry of the order or finding is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping or subsidizing of the goods. If the CBSA determines that the expiry of the order or finding in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping or subsidizing, the Tribunal will then conduct an inquiry to determine if the continued or resumed dumping or subsidizing is likely to result in injury or retardation.

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Documents may be filed electronically with the Tribunal through its Secure E-filing Service. The service utilizes the Government of Canada’s epass system, which allows the secure transmission of confidential business information. The information is fully encrypted from the sender to the Tribunal.

However, paper copies must still be filed in the required 20 copies. When a paper copy and an electronic version of the same document are filed with the Tribunal, both must be identical. In case of discrepancies, the paper copy will be considered the original.

Written and oral communication with the Tribunal may be in English or in French.

Ottawa, August 11, 2009

HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

Wide-width cotton, flax and rayon fabrics

Notice is hereby given that, on August 10, 2009, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal submitted to the Minister of Finance, pursuant to section 19 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a report, with a recommendation for tariff relief in respect of a request filed by St. Geneve regarding wide-width cotton, flax and rayon fabrics (Request No. TR-2008-002).

August 10, 2009

By order of the Tribunal
HÉLÈNE NADEAU
Secretary

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission’s original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, Room 206, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0N2, 819-997-2429 (telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), 819-994-0218 (fax);

— Metropolitan Place, Suite 1410, 99 Wyse Road, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5, 902-426-7997 (telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), 902-426-2721 (fax);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, 204-983-6306 (telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), 204-983-6317 (fax);

— 530–580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, 604-666-2111 (telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), 604-666-8322 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 205 Viger Avenue W, Suite 504, Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2, 514-283-6607 (telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), 514-283-3689 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, 416-952-9096 (telephone), 416-954-6343 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, 306-780-3422 (telephone), 306-780-3319 (fax);

— CRTC Documentation Centre, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4, 780-495-3224 (telephone), 780-495-3214 (fax).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISION

The complete text of the decision summarized below is available from the offices of the CRTC.

2009-469 August 5, 2009

Aboriginal Peoples Television Network Incorporated
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the television station APTN in order to allow temporary flexibility in meeting certain requirements during the 2010 Olympic Games in Vancouver.

August 5, 2009

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2009-481 August 11, 2009

Various applicants
Ottawa, Ontario; and Gatineau, Quebec

Confirmed, with changes — Approval of applications by Astral Media Radio inc. and by Frank Torres, on behalf of a corporation to be incorporated (now known as Torres Media Ottawa Inc.) for broadcasting licences to operate new English-language commercial FM radio stations to serve Ottawa and Gatineau, as set out in Broadcasting Decision 2008-222.

Approved in part — Application by Radio de la communauté francophone d’Ottawa for a broadcasting licence to operate a new French-language Type B community FM radio station.

Confirmed — Denial of the other applications for broadcasting licences to operate radio stations to serve Ottawa and Gatineau.

Confirmed — Denial of the application by Instant Information Services Incorporated to modify the authorized contour of the English-language commercial tourist radio station CIIO-FM Ottawa.

2009-482 August 12, 2009

CTV Television Inc. and CTV Limited
Across Canada

Approved — Amendments to the broadcasting licences of various analog television stations in order to allow the provision of high-definition signals by direct feed to broadcasting distribution undertakings.

2009-487 August 13, 2009

Cogeco Cable Québec Inc. and Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., partners in a general partnership carrying on business as Cogeco Cable Québec General Partnership
Province of Quebec

Cogeco Cable Canada GP Inc. (the general partner) and Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. (the limited partner), carrying on business as Cogeco Cable Canada LP
Province of Ontario

Approved — Application to acquire from Cogeco Cable Québec Inc., as part of a corporate reorganization, the assets of the cable broadcasting distribution undertakings (BDUs) operating under Class 1, 2 and 3 regional licences in the province of Quebec and application to acquire from Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., as part of a corporate reorganization, the assets of the cable BDUs operating under Class 1 and 3 regional licences in Ontario and the video-on-demand undertaking operating in Ontario.

2009-488 August 13, 2009

Shaw Communications Inc., on behalf of Shaw Cablesystems Limited and Videon CableSystems Inc.
Various locations

Approved in part — Amendment to the broadcasting licences for certain Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 cable broadcasting distribution undertakings serving various locations across Canada.

Approved — Conditions of licence authorizing the 22 cable systems that are the subject of this decision to distribute high-definition (HD) U.S. 4+1 signals originating in Seattle, Washington, in lieu of HD U.S. 4+1 signals originating in Spokane, Washington.

Denied — Authorization to distribute certain of the U.S. 4+1 signals originating in Detroit, Michigan.

2009-490 August 14, 2009

Sun TV Company
Toronto, Hamilton, London and Ottawa, Ontario

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licences for the television station CKXT-TV Toronto and the transitional digital television station CKXT-DT Toronto and transmitters in Hamilton, London and Ottawa, from September 1, 2009, to August 31, 2010.

2009-491 August 14, 2009

Food Network Canada Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the national specialty service known as Food Network Canada to allow the service to be made available for distribution in high-definition format.

2009-492 August 14, 2009

Showcase Television Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the national specialty service known as Showcase to allow the service to be made available for distribution in high-definition format.

2009-493 August 14, 2009

HGTV Canada Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the national specialty service known as HGTV Canada — Home and Garden Television to allow the service to be made available for distribution in high-definition format.

2009-494 August 14, 2009

History Television Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the national specialty service known as History Television to allow the service to be made available for distribution in high-definition format.

2009-495 August 14, 2009

Life Network Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the national specialty service known as Slice to allow the service to be made available for distribution in high-definition format.

2009-496 August 14, 2009

NGC Channel Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Amendment to the broadcasting licence for the national Category 2 specialty service known as National Geographic Channel to allow the service to be made available for distribution in high-definition format.

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-411-3

Notice of hearing

November 16, 2009
Gatineau, Quebec Policy proceeding on a group-based approach to the licensing of television services and on certain issues relating to conventional television
Clarification on the scope of the proceeding — negotiated fair value for local conventional television signals
Change of date of the public hearing and extension of the deadline for comments
Date of hearing: November 16, 2009
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: September 14, 2009

1. In Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2009-411-2, the Commission extended the deadline for filing written comments to August 17, 2009, in light of the fact that it required time to consider the implications of litigation filed by Bell Canada and related companies in the Federal Court of Appeal on the current proceeding. The Commission also indicated that it intended to issue an amended Broadcasting Notice of Consultation, if appropriate, on or before August 14, 2009.

2. In paragraph 37 of Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2009-411, the Commission states that

[t]he Commission is now of the view that a negotiated solution for compensation for the free market value of local conventional television signals is also appropriate.

3. Given the concerns raised by Bell Canada and its related companies, as described in Notice of Consultation 2009-411-2, and wanting to remove any lingering doubts as to the validity of its process and decisions, the Commission will proceed with an examination de novo of the question of whether or not the Commission should put in place a regime for the establishment of fair value for local conventional television signals. This examination will take place during the current proceeding.

4. As such, the Commission amends paragraphs 37 to 39 of Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2009-411 to read (the changes are in bold):

37. In Broadcasting Public Notice 2007-53 and again in Broadcasting Public Notice 2008-100, the Commission elected not to grant fee for carriage to conventional broadcasters but did provide broadcasters with the right to negotiate the terms under which their distant signals will be retransmitted. The Commission considers that it is appropriate, in the context of the present proceeding, to consider whether or not a negotiated solution for the compensation for the fair value of local conventional television signals is also appropriate, and is seeking comment on this question.

38. The Commission expects that negotiations for distant conventional television signals, and for conventional local television signals, should the Commission decide that the latter is appropriate, will be completed before the long-term renewal of licences and that they will take place in a way that ensures that Canadians will not lose access to programming services. In the absence of a negotiated agreement or agreements, the Commission is considering what strategies and procedures are most likely to contribute to and/or ensure a timely resolution of negotiations and is seeking comment on this issue as well.

39. The Commission is now seeking comment on what mechanism should be used for establishing a negotiated fair value for distant conventional signals, as well as local conventional signals, should the Commission find that the latter is appropriate. To that end, the Commission is seeking responses, with detailed rationale and supporting evidence, for the following questions:

(a) What regulatory measures are needed to facilitate fair negotiations?

(b) What methodology and criteria should be used for determining the fair market value of a conventional signal?

(c) Are there any other considerations that the Commission should take into account?

(d) What safeguards need to be established so that the negotiations are successful and are restricted to the issue of a negotiated fair market value for the conventional signal being distributed?

(e) What is the appropriate method, if required, to achieve resolution through binding arbitration?

5. In order to permit interested parties sufficient time to adapt their comments to reflect these new considerations, the Commission extends the deadline for filing written comments on this and all other issues described in Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2009-411 to September 14, 2009. As a result, the hearing will now commence on November 16, 2009.

6. All other aspects of Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2009-411, including the other issues described therein, remain unchanged.

August 11, 2009

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-418-1

Notice of hearing

January 18, 2010
Gatineau, Quebec Review of campus and community radio
Change of date of the public hearing and extension of the deadline for comments
Date of hearing: January 18, 2010
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: October 16, 2009

With this notice, the Commission amends certain scheduled dates established in Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2009-418. The public hearing will now begin on January 18, 2010, and the deadline for the filing of comments will be October 16, 2009.

August 13, 2009

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-461-1

Notice of hearing

September 29, 2009
Gatineau, Quebec
Correction to item 17

Further to its Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2009-461, the Commission announces the following:

The following item is amended (the change is in bold).

Item 17
Various locations, Quebec
Application No. 2009-0901-2

Application by Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) for a licence to operate a French-language television programming undertaking in Rimouski, Quebec, and for the authority to transfer the following transmitters from the regional station CBVT-TV Québec to the CJBR-TV Rimouski station: CBGAT-TV Matane, CBGAT-TV-1 Mont-Climont, CBGAT-TV-2 Murdochville, CBGAT-TV-3 Grande-Vallée, CBGAT-TV-4 Mont-Louis, CBGAT-TV-5 Causapscal, CBGAT-TV-6 Cap-Chat, CBGAT-TV-7 Saint-René-de-Matane, CBGATTV-8 Marsoui, CBGAT-TV-9 Gros-Morne, CBGAT-TV-10 Mont-Louis-en-Haut, CBGAT-TV-11 Sainte-Anne-des-Monts, CBGAT-TV-13 Rivière-à-Claude, CBGAT-TV-14 Carleton, CBGAT-TV-15 Chandler, CBGAT-TV-16 Cloridorme, CBGAT-TV-17 Gaspé, CBGAT-TV-18 L’Anse-à-Valleau, CBGAT-TV-19 Lac-Humqui, CBGAT-TV-20 Percé, CBGAT-TV-21 Port-Daniel-Gascons, CBGAT-TV-22 Rivière-au-Renard, CBGAT-TV-23 Les Méchins, CJBR-TV Rimouski, CJBR-TV-1 Latour, CBST-TV Sept-Îles, CBST-TV-1 Havre-Saint-Pierre, CBST-TV-6 Rivière-au-Tonnerre, CBST-TV-7 Aguanish-Natashquan, CBST-TV-8 Baie-Johan-Beetz, CBST-TV-9 Gethsémani/La Romaine, CBST-TV-11 Harrington Harbour, CBST-TV-12 Tête-à-la-Baleine, CBST-TV-13 La Tabatière, CBST-TV-14 Saint-Augustin (Saguenay), CBST-TV-15 Old Fort Bay, CBST-TV-16 Rivière-Saint-Paul, CBST-TV-17 Blanc-Sablon, CBST-TV-18 Longue-Pointe-de-Mingan and CBST-TV-19 Baie-Comeau, Quebec.

The licensee estimates that it expects to draw an additional $400,000 in revenues per year by soliciting local advertising in the Rimouski region.

August 3, 2009

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-461-2

Notice of hearing

September 29, 2009
Gatineau, Quebec
Revised hearing time

Further to its Broadcasting Notices of Consultation 2009-461 and 2009-461-1, the Commission announces the following:

The hearing will now commence at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, September 29, 2009, at the Commission headquarters, 1 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec.

August 6, 2009

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-470

Notice of application received

Lethbridge, Alberta
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: August 25, 2009

The Commission has received the following application:

1. Clear Sky Radio Inc.
    Lethbridge, Alberta

To amend the broadcasting licence for the English-language commercial radio programming undertaking CJOC-FM Lethbridge by replacing a condition of licence pertaining to Canadian Content Development (CCD) contributions set out in Broadcasting Decision 2006-328.

August 5, 2009

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-477

Notice of applications received

Various locations
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: September 11, 2009

The Commission has received the following applications:

1. Northern Native Broadcasting (Terrace, B.C.)
    Seely Mountain, British Columbia

To amend the broadcasting licence for the English- and Aboriginal-language Native Type B radio programming undertaking CFNR-FM Terrace.

2. Northern Native Broadcasting (Terrace, B.C.)
    Aiyansh, Alkali Lake, Anahim Lake, Bella Coola, Canyon City, Dog Creek,
    Fort Babine, Greenville, Ingenkia, Kitwancool, Kitwanga, Klemtu, Masset,
    McLeod Lake, Metlakatla, Nemaiah Valley, New Bella Bella, Port Simpson,
    Redstone Flat, Skidegate, Tachie and Toosey Indian Reserve, British Columbia

To amend the broadcasting licence for the English- and Aboriginal-language Native Type B radio programming undertaking CFNR-FM Terrace.

August 7, 2009

[34-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CONSULTATION 2009-480

Notice of application received

Creighton, Saskatchewan
Deadline for submission of interventions and/or comments: September 14, 2009

The Commission has received the following application:

1. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)
    Creighton, Saskatchewan

To amend the broadcasting licence of the English-language FM radio programming undertaking CBKA-FM La Ronge.

August 10, 2009

[34-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Martin Boyer, Manager (CO-02), International Relations, Canadian Space Agency, Saint-Hubert, Quebec, to allow him to be a candidate before and during the election period for the position of Councillor, Electoral District No. 7, Saint-Lambert, Quebec, municipal election to be held on November 1, 2009.

August 10, 2009

MARIA BARRADOS
President

[34-1-o]