Vol. 135, No 35 — September 1, 2001

COMMISSIONS

CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of Registration of a Charity

The following notice of proposed revocation was sent to the charity listed below revoking it for failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act as listed in this notice:

"Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraphs 168(1)(b) 168(1)(c) and 168(1)(e) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charity listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(b) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette."

Business Number	Name/Address
141022988RR0001	MARITIME AWARENESS GROUP INC., MONCTON, N.B.

MAUREEN KIDD
Director General
Charities Directorate

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY

CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY ACT

Notice Amending the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees Notice

The Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, pursuant to subsection 24(1) and section 25 of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act, hereby amends the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees Notice, published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on May 13, 2000, in accordance with the annexed notice.

Ottawa, August 9, 2001

LYLE VANCLIEF
Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food

NOTICE AMENDING THE CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY FEES NOTICE

1. The portion of subitem 2(2) of the table to Part 11 of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees Notice (see footnote 1) in column 1 is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
2.	(2) In addition to the fee payable under item 1 for the consideration of an application for a permit required by paragraph 12.1(a) of the Regulations for the import of cattle, for the purpose of feeding, from the United States, whose movements are restricted by the permit, for each animal

2. The portion of item 7 of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

Item

Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use

7.

For the inspection and consideration of a private quarantine facility, if approval of the facility under section 60 of the Regulations is sought for the quarantine of ruminants, porcines, ratites or ratite hatching eggs, or of premises for the import of cattle, for the purpose of feeding, from the United States, whose movements are restricted by the permit required by paragraph 12.1(a) of the Regulations

3. (1) The portion of paragraph 14(1)(b) of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
14.	(b) feeder calves imported under paragraph 12.1(b) of the Regulations and section 17 of Part III of the import reference document

(2) The portion of paragraph 14(1)(d) of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
14.	(d) cats or dogs imported under paragraph 12.1(b) of the Regulations, if an inspector has made a vaccination order under section 1 or 2, respectively, of Part III of the import reference document

(3) The portion of paragraph 14(1)(e) of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
14.	(e) any animal imported for immediate slaughter under paragraph 12.1(b) of the Regulations and section 5 of Part III of the import reference document

(4) The portion of paragraph 14(1)(g) of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
14.	(g) sexually intact cattle, sheep or goats imported from the United States under paragraph 12.1(b) of the Regulations and section 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 14.4, 14.6, 15 or 18 of Part III of the import reference document

(5) The portion of paragraph 14(1)(h) of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
14.	(h) feeder cattle, feeder sheep and feeder goats imported under paragraph 12.1(b) of the Regulations and section 14.5, 14.6, 16 or 19 of Part III of the import reference document

(6) The portion of paragraph 14(1)(n) of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
14.	(n) embryos imported under section 11 of the Regulations

4. (1) The portion of paragraph 15(a) of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
15.	(a) for a shipment of feeder calves imported under paragraph 12.1(b) of the Regulations and section 17 of Part III of the import reference document

(2) The portion of paragraph 15(b) of the table to Part 11 of the Notice in column 1 before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following:

Item	Column 1 Service, Right, Product, Privilege or Use
15.	(b) for a shipment of sexually intact bovines imported from the United States under paragraph 12.1(b) of the Regulations and section 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 14.4, 14.6 or 15 of Part III of the import reference document

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The publication of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees Notice (the Notice) in May 2000 consolidated the majority of the fee setting authority for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) under the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act. Prior to the publication of the Notice, most fees were set by Ministerial order under paragraphs 19(1)(b) and 19.1(b) of the Financial Administration Act. Concurrent with the implementation of the new Notice, most fees orders made under the Financial Administration Act were repealed and consolidated into the new Notice.

This amendment package makes administrative changes to the table to Part 11 — Health of Animals Fees of the Notice. These changes are necessary due to the promulgation of regulations to amend the Health of Animals Regulations which resulted in the replacing and re-numbering of sections 10 to 33.1 of the Regulations and the creation of an import reference document. A number of the provisions in Part 11 of the former Notice referenced the former sections 10 to 33.1 of the Health of Animals Regulations and therefore must be amended to refer accurately to the new provisions of the Regulations. These amendments to the Notice are administrative in nature, do not change the fees for import services charged to importers of regulated animals and germplasm, and are revenue neutral.

The amendments to the Health of Animals Regulations simplify those provisions with respect to importation and allow the CFIA to fulfill commitments made to our domestic industry and our trading partners.

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

EXPIRY OF FINDING

Concrete Panels

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice, pursuant to subsection 76.03(2) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), that its finding made on June 27, 1997, in Inquiry No. NQ-96-004, concerning concrete panels, reinforced with fiberglass mesh, originating in or exported from the United States of America and produced by or on behalf of Custom Building Products, its successors and assigns, for use or consumption in the province of British Columbia or Alberta, is scheduled to expire on June 26, 2002 (Expiry No. LE-2001-004). Under SIMA, findings of injury or threat of injury and the associated special protection in the form of anti-dumping or countervailing duties expire five years from the date of the last order or finding, unless an expiry review has been initiated before that date. An expiry review will not be initiated unless the Tribunal decides that there is sufficient information to indicate that it is warranted.

Persons or governments requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review of the said finding should file 20 copies of written public submissions containing relevant information, opinions and arguments, with the Secretary of the Tribunal not later than September 18, 2001. Persons or governments should endeavour to base their submissions exclusively on public information; however, confidential information relevant to the issues before the Tribunal may be filed, if necessary, along with a comprehensive public summary or edited version thereof.

Submissions should address all relevant factors, including:

— the likelihood of continued or resumed dumping of the goods;

— the likely volume and price ranges of dumped imports if dumping were to continue or resume;

— the domestic industry's recent performance, including trends in production, sales, market share and profits;

— the likelihood of injury to the domestic industry if the finding were allowed to expire, having regard to the anticipated effects of a continuation or resumption of dumped imports on the industry's future performance;

— any other developments affecting, or likely to affect, the performance of the domestic industry;

— changes in circumstances, domestically or internationally, including changes in the supply of or demand for the goods, and changes in trends in, and sources of, imports into Canada; and

— any other matter that is relevant.

Where there are opposing views, each person or government that filed a submission in response to the notice of expiry will be given an opportunity to respond in writing to the representations of other persons or governments. In these circumstances, the Tribunal will distribute copies of the public submissions to each person or government that filed a submission with the Tribunal. Persons or governments wishing to respond to the submissions must do so not later than September 27, 2001. If confidential submissions have been filed, the Secretary will notify persons or governments and instruct them on how they may access these submissions through qualified counsel.

The Tribunal will issue a decision on October 15, 2001, on whether an expiry review is warranted based on the submissions and representations received and the responses to them.

— If there is no request for a review, the Tribunal will not initiate a review and the finding will expire on its expiry date.

— If the Tribunal decides that a review is not warranted, the finding will expire on its expiry date. The Tribunal will issue its reasons not later than 15 days after its decision.

— If the Tribunal decides to initiate a review, it will issue a notice of expiry review.

The Tribunal's Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews can be found on its Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca. In addition to providing more detailed information on the proceeding whereby the Tribunal determines if an expiry review is warranted, the draft guideline explains how an expiry review is conducted if the Tribunal determines that one is warranted. In an expiry review, the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (the Commissioner) first determines whether the expiry of the order or finding is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping or subsidizing of the goods. If the Commissioner determines that the expiry of the order or finding in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping or subsidizing, the Tribunal will then conduct an inquiry to determine if the continued or resumed dumping or subsidizing is likely to result in injury or retardation. The Tribunal's notice of expiry review will provide more information on the expiry review process.

Written submissions, correspondence or requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to: The Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (Telephone), (613) 990-2439 (Facsimile).

Written or oral communications to the Tribunal may be made in English or in French.

Ottawa, August 24, 2001

MICHEL P. GRANGER
Secretary

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

INQUIRY

EDP Hardware and Software

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) has received a complaint (File No. PR-2001-025) from Empowered Networks Inc., of Kanata, Ontario, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. M93980-012711/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services on behalf of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. The solicitation is for the provision of a network management reporting software. Pursuant to subsection 30.13(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act and subsection 7(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations, notice is hereby given that the Tribunal has decided to conduct an inquiry into this complaint.

It is alleged that the evaluation process used was contrary to the one described in the Request for Proposal.

Further information may be obtained from: The Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (Telephone), (613) 990-2439 (Facsimile).

Ottawa, August 23, 2001

MICHEL P. GRANGER
Secretary

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

WITHDRAWAL

EDP Hardware and Software

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal received a complaint (File No. PR-2001-018) from Corel Corporation (the complainant), of Ottawa, Ontario, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. V9418-000047/A) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services on behalf of the Department of Human Resources Development. The solicitation is for a single licence agreement for a current, commercially available office automation suite.

Notice is hereby given that the complainant has withdrawn the complaint.

Further information may be obtained from: The Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (Telephone), (613) 990-2439 (Facsimile).

Ottawa, August 22, 2001

MICHEL P. GRANGER
Secretary

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION ANDTELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:

— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, 1 Promenade du Portage, Ground Floor, Hull, Quebec K1A 0N2, (819) 997-2429 (Telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), (819) 994-0218 (Facsimile);

— Bank of Commerce Building, Suite 1007, 1809 Barrington Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K8, (902) 426-7997 (Telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), (902) 426-2721 (Facsimile);

— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, (204) 983-6306 (Telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), (204) 983-6317 (Facsimile);

— 530-580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, (604) 666-2111 (Telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), (604) 666-8322 (Facsimile);

— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 405 De Maisonneuve Boulevard E, 2nd Floor, Suite B2300, Montréal, Quebec H2L 4J5, (514) 283-6607 (Telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), (514) 283-3689 (Facsimile);

— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, (416) 952-9096 (Telephone), (416) 954-6343 (Facsimile);

— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, (306) 780-3422 (Telephone), (306) 780-3319 (Facsimile);

— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, Scotia Place Tower Two, 19th Floor, Suite 1909, 10060 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3R8, (780) 495-3224 (Telephone), (780) 495-3214 (Facsimile).

Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.

Secretary General

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2001-440-1 August 21, 2001

Correction to Decision CRTC 2001-440

In Decision CRTC 2001-440, the Commission renewed the broadcasting licences for a number of transitional digital radio undertakings. One of the undertakings licensed to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation was incorrectly identified as CBL Toronto. The call sign should have read CBLA-FM Toronto.

2001-506 August 21, 2001

CTV Television Inc.
Toronto, Ontario
St. John's, Argentia, etc., Newfoundland

Approved — New English-language television programming network that will provide programming to CJON-TV St. John's and its transmitters elsewhere in Newfoundland. The licence will be in effect from September 1, 2001, to August 31, 2008.

2001-507 August 21, 2001

CTV Television Inc.
Toronto, Thunder Bay etc., Ontario; Lloydminster, Wainwright, etc., Alberta; Alcot Trail and Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan

Approved — New English-language television programming network to operate for the purpose of providing programming to Thunder Bay Electronics Inc., Norcom Communications Limited and Mid-West Television Ltd. The licence will be in effect from September 1, 2001, to August 31, 2008.

2001-508 August 21, 2001

CTV Television Inc., on behalf of Newfoundland Broadcasting Company Limited
St. John's, Argentia, Newfoundland

Approved — Amendments to CJON-TV's condition of licence pertaining to network affiliation.

2001-509 August 21, 2001

CTV Television Inc., on behalf of Thunder Bay Electronics Inc., Norcom Communications Limited, and Mid-West Television Ltd.
Thunder Bay and Kenora, Ontario;
Lloydminster, Wainwright, etc., Alberta;
Alcot Trail and Meadow Lakes, Saskatchewan

Approved — Applications by CTV Television Inc. on behalf of the three broadcasters noted above, for amendments to their current conditions of licence pertaining to network affiliation.

2001-510 August 21, 2001

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Québec, Quebec

Approved — Addition of a transmitter for CBM-FM Montréal at Québec.

Numbers 2001-511 to 513 have been assigned to letter decisions

2001-514 August 21, 2001

3224503 Canada inc.
Drummondville, Quebec
3145069 Canada inc.
Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec

Approved — Transfer of the effective control of 3224503 Canada inc., licensee of CHRD-FM Drummondville, and of 3145069 Canada inc., licensee of CFEI-FM Saint-Hyacinthe to Astral Radio Group Inc.

2001-515 August 21, 2001

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Approved — New French-language FM radio programming undertaking at Winnipeg, expiring August 31, 2007.

Number 2001-516 has been assigned to a letter decision

2001-517 August 24, 2001

Fairchild Radio (Vancouver FM) Ltd.
Vancouver, British Columbia

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for CHKG-FM Vancouver, from September 1, 2001, to August 31, 2008.

2001-518 August 24, 2001

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Sackville, New Brunswick

Approved — Renewal of the broadcasting licence for CKCX Sackville, from September 1, 2001, to August 31, 2008.

2001-519 August 24, 2001

CHUM Limited
London, Wheatley, etc., Ontario

Approved — Licence amendments for CFPL-TV, CHWI-TV, CKNX-TV, CKVR-TV and CHRO-TV.

Number 2001-520 does not exist and 2001-521 has been assigned to a letter decision

2001-522 August 24, 2001

Corus Entertainment Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Authority to acquire of a 20 percent voting interest in Teletoon Canada Inc.

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2001-39-2

Call for Applications for a Broadcasting Licence to Carry on a Radio Programming Undertaking to Serve Toronto, Ontario

In Public Notice CRTC 2001-39 the Commission invited interested parties to file applications for AM and/or FM broadcasting licences to serve the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) by May 22, 2001.

However, the Commission suspended the call for applications (Public Notice CRTC 2001-39-1) in order to accommodate Industry Canada's review of broadcasting capacity in the GTA.

On July 20, 2001, Industry Canada announced that additional radio broadcasting capacity would be made available in the GTA, stating:

"Industry Canada has evaluated the radio programming capacity in the region and determined that there are seven channels available to accommodate new AM radio services, ten program channels for new digital radio services, and two frequencies available for small FM stations."

Industry Canada also stated that it was exploring other options such as relaxing technical rules, examining Subsidiary Communication Multiplex Operation (SCMO) sub-carriers, and monitoring international spectrum allocation and has indicated that:

"...additional FM radio capacity may be found by relaxing existing technical rules. Industry Canada is currently testing radio receivers to ensure interference-free reception of existing and new FM radio stations. When testing concludes at the end of 2001, Industry Canada will analyse the results and, if appropriate, propose new technical rules."

In view of Industry Canada's continuing evaluation of its technical rules and FM radio capacity, the Commission considers that it would be premature to re-activate the GTA radio call until Industry Canada has completed its testing and issued its conclusions. Accordingly, the Commission hereby continues to suspend the deadline for filing applications until further notice.

The Commission, therefore, expects to re-activate this call during the winter of 2002 with a possible public hearing in the spring of 2002.

August 23, 2001

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2001-66-1

Ownership of analog discretionary services by cable undertakings — Amendment to the Commission's policy.

August 24, 2001

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2001-93-1

Further to its Public Notice CRTC 2001-93 dated August 17, 2001, the Commission announces the following:

Correction to Item 1

The licensee's address and the address for the examination of the application should have read as noted in the integral version of this public notice

Aliant Telecom Inc. (formerly Maritime Tel & Tel Limited)
Halifax Regional Municipality (Halifax, Dartmouth, Bedford and Sackville), Nova Scotia

To amend the licence of the cable system serving the above-mentioned localities.

August 23, 2001

[35-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE 2001-96

Call for Comments — Bulk Billing by Direct-to-Home Satellite Distribution Undertakings

In this notice, the Commission calls for comments on whether direct-to-home satellite distribution undertakings should be permitted, as cable broadcasting distribution undertakings currently are, to engage in the practice of bulk billing without restrictions.

In Decision CRTC 2001-521, issued today, the Commission addresses matters raised in a complaint filed by Rogers Cable Inc. (Rogers). In its complaint, Rogers alleged that Star Choice Communications Inc. (Star Choice) had breached the terms of its direct-to-home (DTH) distribution licence by entering into bulk billing arrangements with owners of various multiple unit dwellings (MUDs) in and around Toronto.

Rogers stated that bulk billing occurs when a building owner acquires programming services from a broadcasting distribution undertaking (BDU) on a wholesale basis for redistribution to the tenants of the owner's building. Rogers indicated that, in such circumstances, the building owner is responsible for selecting the services that will be available to the tenants who reside in the building, and for paying the BDU for those services. Rogers added that the building owner recoups the fee that he or she pays to the BDU for bulk delivery of the programming services by charging each tenant a fixed monthly fee, which is typically included in the tenant's monthly rent.

Rogers argued further that, by providing the buildings in question with television services on a bulk basis, Star Choice is providing services contrary to Decision CRTC 96-529, which awarded Star Choice its DTH licence, but restricted Star Choice's authority to distribute programming services, as follows:

The service herein authorized, to be known as Star Choice, will derive its revenues entirely from subscription fees, and will provide programming services exclusively to individual subscribers in all parts of Canada on a DTH basis (emphasis added by Rogers).

In response to Rogers' complaint, Star Choice argued, among other things, that a prohibition on the use of bulk billing arrangements by DTH undertakings would create a competitive advantage for terrestrial BDUs and could reduce the choice that consumers have among service providers.

In its reply comments, Rogers acknowledged that cable operators are permitted to enter into bulk arrangements. Rogers added that bulk billing was a method used in a monopoly environment to provide a discounted service offering to subscribers residing in MUDs. Rogers noted that it still has some buildings under a bulk contract. However, most building owners have chosen not to renew bulk agreements, in favour of offering choice through allowing a second provider into their buildings.

In Decision 2001-521, the Commission expressed concern that the inability of DTH providers to engage in the practice of bulk billing without restrictions, as cable companies currently do, may place DTH providers at a competitive disadvantage relative to other types of distribution undertakings. The Commission is of the preliminary view that the public interest would best be served by permitting cable and DTH distributors to engage in the practice of bulk billing on the same basis. This would require amendments to the DTH licences currently held by Star Choice and Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership.

The Commission requests comments on the preliminary view set out above.

The Commission will hold a two-stage written comment process for this proceeding. In the first stage, the Commission will accept comments that it receives on or before September 21, 2001. The Commission invites interested parties then to file replies to any of the comments submitted during the first stage. Parties will have until October 12, 2001, to do so.

The Commission will not formally acknowledge comments. It will, however, fully consider all comments and they will form part of the public record of the proceeding, provided that the procedures for filing have been followed.

August 24, 2001

[35-1-o]

MACKENZIE VALLEY LAND AND WATER BOARD

MACKENZIE VALLEY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT

NORTHWEST TERRITORIES WATERS ACT

Public Hearing

The Town of Hay River has made and application to the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board to renew Water Licence N1L4-0053 for water use within the Town of Hay River, Northwest Territories.

A public hearing on the application will be held, under subsection 21(2) of the Northwest Territories Waters Act, by the Board on November 8 and 9, 2001, at the Hay River Community Hall.

Written submissions in relation to this application must be submitted to the Office of the Board by 4 p.m., October 12, 2001. The address of the Board is c/o The Chair, Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board, P.O. Box 2130, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories X1A 2P6, (867) 669-0506 (Telephone), (867) 873-6610 (Facsimile).

If no notice is received of persons indicating their intention to appear and make presentations concerning this application by 4 p.m., October 12, 2001, and the applicant consents in writing to the disposition of the matter without a public hearing, the Board may cancel the hearing in accordance with subsection 21(3) of the Act.

Information submitted by the applicant relevant to the application can be reviewed at the Board's Web site at www.mvlwb. com, or at the Office of the Board, 4910 50th Avenue (YK Centre), 7th Floor, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories.

September 1, 2001

MELODY J. MCLEOD
Chair

[35-1-o]

Footnote 1

Canada Gazette, Part I, May 13, 2000, Vol. 134, No. 20, Supplement

NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).