Vol. 134, No. 48 — November 25, 2000
INCOME TAX ACT
Revocation of Registration of a Charity
The following notice of proposed revocation was sent to the charity listed below revoking it for failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act as listed in this notice:
"Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charity listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(b) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette."
| Business Number | Name/Address |
|---|---|
| 868211558RR0001 | FRIENDS IN NEED, WINNIPEG MAN. |
MAUREEN KIDD
Director General
Charities Directorate
[48-1-o]
SPECIAL IMPORT MEASURES ACT
Grain Corn — Decision
On November 7, 2000, the Commissioner of Customs and Revenue made a preliminary determination of dumping and subsidizing under subsection 38(1) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), respecting grain corn in all forms, excluding white dent corn imported by snack food and tortilla manufacturers for use by them in the manufacture of snack food and tortillas, seed corn (used for reproductive purposes), sweet corn, and popping corn, originating in or exported from the United States of America, and imported into Canada for use or consumption west of the Manitoba/Ontario border. Grain corn is usually classified under these Harmonized System classification numbers:
| column 1 | column 2 |
|---|---|
| 1005.90.00.11 | 1005.90.00.14 |
| 1005.90.00.12 | 1005.90.00.19 |
| 1005.90.00.13 | 1005.90.00.99 |
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal will make a full inquiry into the question of injury to the domestic industry, and will make an order or finding not later than 120 days after its receipt of the notice of the preliminary determination of dumping and subsidizing.
Pursuant to section 8 of SIMA, provisional duty is payable on subject goods released from customs during the period commencing on the date the preliminary determination was made, and ending on the earlier of the day the investigation is terminated, the day on which the Tribunal makes an order or finding, or the day an undertaking is accepted. The amount of provisional duty payable is not greater than the estimated margin of dumping and the amount of the subsidy. The payment of such provisional duty is hereby demanded.
Information
A statement of reasons for this decision has been provided to persons directly interested. It is also on the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency's Web site at: http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/ customs/business/sima/index-eng.html or can be obtained by contacting Roger Lyons, Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate, at (613) 954-7342 or by facsimile at (613) 954-2510 or electronic mail at roger.lyons@ccra-adrc.gc.ca.
Ottawa, November 7, 2000
R. A. SÉGUIN
Acting Director General
Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate
[48-1-o]
SPECIAL IMPORT MEASURES ACT
Waterproof Footwear and Bottoms — Decision
On November 8, 2000, pursuant to paragraph 41(1)(a) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), the Commissioner of Customs and Revenue made a final determination of dumping respecting certain waterproof footwear and bottoms of plastic or rubber, including moulded clogs, originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China, excluding ski-boots, skating boots and all footwear subject to the order made in the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Review No. RR-97-001. The goods in question are usually classified under the Harmonized System tariff numbers:
| column 1 | column 2 |
|---|---|
| 6401.10.19.00 | 6402.91.00.92 |
| 6401.10.20.00 | 6402.91.00.93 |
| 6401.91.20.00 | 6403.19.90.90 |
| 6401.92.11.00 | 6403.40.00.10 |
| 6401.92.12.00 | 6403.91.00.10 |
| 6401.92.92.90 | 6403.91.00.91 |
| 6401.99.21.00 | 6403.91.00.92 |
| 6401.99.29.00 | 6403.91.00.93 |
| 6401.99.30.10 | 6404.11.99.90 |
| 6401.99.30.90 | 6404.19.90.20 |
| 6402.19.90.90 | 6404.19.90.91 |
| 6402.91.00.10 | 6404.19.90.92 |
| 6402.91.00.91 | 6404.19.90.93 |
Information
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) is continuing its inquiry into the question of injury to the Canadian industry and will make its finding on or before December 8, 2000. If the Tribunal finds that the dumping has caused injury or is threatening to cause injury, future imports of subject goods may be subject to an anti-dumping duty equal to the amount by which the normal value exceeds the export price of the goods. In that event, all duty payable under section 3 of SIMA is hereby demanded pursuant to section 11 of SIMA.
A statement of reasons explaining these decisions has been provided to persons directly interested in the proceedings. It is available on the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency's Web site at http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/customs/business/sima/index-e. html, or you may request a free copy by contacting Mr. Michel Desmarais, Senior Program Officer, by telephone at (613) 954-7188, by facsimile at (613) 954-2510, or by electronic mail at Michel.Desmarais@ccra-adrc.gc.ca.
Ottawa, November 8, 2000
R. A. SÉGUIN
Acting Director General
Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate
[48-1-o]
EXPIRY OF ORDER
Stainless Steel Welded Pipe
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice, pursuant to subsection 76.03(2) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), that its order made on September 12, 1996, in Review No. RR-96-001, continuing without amendment, its finding made on September 5, 1991, in Inquiry No. NQ-91-001, concerning stainless steel welded pipe, originating in or exported from Taiwan, in nominal pipe sizes ranging from 1/8 in. to 6 in. inclusive and with wall thicknesses varying from 0.060 in. to 0.315 in. (1.525 mm to 8 mm) inclusive, manufactured to specification A-312 prescribed by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), specification SA-312 prescribed by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), or equivalent specifications, is scheduled to expire (Expiry No. LE-2000-003) on September 11, 2001. Under SIMA, findings of injury or threat of injury and the associated special protection in the form of anti-dumping or countervailing duties expire five years from the date of the last order or finding, unless an expiry review has been initiated before that date. An expiry review will not be initiated unless the Tribunal decides that there is sufficient information to indicate that it is warranted.
Persons or governments requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review of the said order should file 20 copies of written public submissions containing relevant information, opinions and arguments, with the Secretary of the Tribunal not later than November 28, 2000. Persons or governments should endeavour to base their submissions exclusively on public information; however, confidential information relevant to the issues before the Tribunal may be filed, if necessary, along with a comprehensive public summary or edited version thereof.
Submissions should address all relevant factors, including:
— the likelihood of continued or resumed dumping of the goods;
— the likely volume and price ranges of dumped imports if dumping were to continue or resume;
— the domestic industry's recent performance, including trends in production, sales, market share and profits;
— the likelihood of injury to the domestic industry if the order were allowed to expire, having regard to the anticipated effects of a continuation or resumption of dumped imports on the industry's future performance;
— any other developments affecting, or likely to affect, the performance of the domestic industry;
— changes in circumstances, domestically or internationally, including changes in the supply of or demand for the goods, and changes in trends in, and sources of, imports into Canada; and
— any other matter that is relevant.
Where there are opposing views, each person or government that filed a submission in response to the notice of expiry will be given an opportunity to respond in writing to the representations of other persons or governments. In these circumstances, the Tribunal will distribute copies of the public submissions to each person or government that filed a submission with the Tribunal. Persons or governments wishing to respond to the submissions must do so no later than December 6, 2000. If confidential submissions have been filed, the Secretary will notify persons or governments on how they may access these submissions through qualified counsel.
The Tribunal will issue a decision on December 29, 2000, on whether an expiry review is warranted based on the submissions and representations received and the responses to them.
— If there is no request for a review, the Tribunal will not initiate a review and the order will expire on its expiry date.
— If the Tribunal decides that a review is not warranted, the order will expire on its expiry date. The Tribunal will issue its reasons no later than 15 days after its decision.
— If the Tribunal decides to initiate a review, it will issue a notice of expiry review.
The Tribunal's Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews can be found on its Web site at www.citt.gc.ca. In addition to providing more detailed information on the proceeding whereby the Tribunal determines if an expiry review is warranted, the draft guideline explains how an expiry review is conducted if the Tribunal determines that one is warranted. In an expiry review, the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (the Commissioner) first determines whether the expiry of the order or finding is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping or subsidizing of the goods. If the Commissioner determines that the expiry of the order or finding in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping or subsidizing, the Tribunal will then conduct an inquiry to determine if the continued or resumed dumping or subsidizing is likely to result in injury or retardation. The Tribunal's notice of expiry review will provide more information on the expiry review process.
Written submissions, correspondence or requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to: The Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (Telephone), (613) 990-2439 (Facsimile).
Written or oral communications to the Tribunal may be made in English or in French.
Ottawa, November 10, 2000
MICHEL P. GRANGER
Secretary
[48-1-o]
EXPIRY REVIEW OF ORDER
Carbon Steel Welded Pipe
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice that it will, pursuant to subsection 76.03(3) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), initiate an expiry review (Expiry Review No. RR-2000-002) of its order made on July 25, 1996, in Review No. RR-95-002, continuing without amendment, its finding made on July 26, 1991, in Inquiry No. NQ-90-005, concerning carbon steel welded pipe originating in or exported from Argentina, India, Romania, Taiwan, Thailand and Venezuela, in the nominal size range 12.7 mm to 406.4 mm (1/2 in. to 16 in.) inclusive, in various forms and finishes, meeting one or more of the following specifications: ASTM A53, ASTM A120, ASTM A795, ASTM A252, ASTM A589 or AWWA C200-80, or equivalent specifications, including water well casing, piling pipe, sprinkler pipe and fencing pipe; and its finding made on January 23, 1992, in Inquiry No. NQ-91-003, concerning carbon steel welded pipe originating in or exported from Brazil, produced to ASTM standards A53 or A120 in sizes from 13.7 mm (0.54 in.) to 406.4 mm (16.00 in.) outside diameter, with plain or finished ends and with black, regular mill coat or galvanized surface finishes.
Notice of Expiry No. LE-2000-002, issued on September 22, 2000, informed interested persons and governments of the impending expiry of the order. On the basis of available information, including representations requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review and responses to these representations received by the Tribunal in reply to the notice, the Tribunal is of the opinion that a review of the order is warranted. The Tribunal has notified the Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (the Commissioner), as well as other interested persons and governments, of its decision.
The Tribunal has issued a Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews that can be found on the Tribunal's Web site at www.citt.gc.ca. In this expiry review, the Commissioner must determine whether the expiry of the order in respect of certain carbon steel welded pipe is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping of the goods.
If the Commissioner determines that the expiry of the order in respect of any goods is likely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping, the Commissioner will provide the Tribunal with the information that is required under the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules. The Tribunal will then conduct an inquiry to determine if the continued or resumed dumping is likely to result in injury or retardation.
If the Commissioner determines that the expiry of the order in respect of any goods is unlikely to result in the continuation or resumption of dumping, the Tribunal will not consider those goods in its subsequent determination of the likelihood of injury or retardation and will issue an order rescinding the order with respect to those goods.
The Commissioner must provide notice of his determination, with reasons, within 120 days after receiving notice of the Tribunal's decision to initiate an expiry review, that is, no later than March 9, 2001. The Commissioner will also notify all persons or governments that were notified by the Tribunal of the commencement of an expiry review, as well as any others that participated in the Commissioner's investigation.
Letters have been sent to parties with a known interest in the expiry review providing them with the schedule respecting both the Commissioner's investigation and the Tribunal's inquiry, should the Commissioner determine that the expiry of the order in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping.
Commissioner's Investigation
The Commissioner will conduct his investigation pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and the administrative guidelines set forth in the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate's publication entitled Guidelines on the Conduct of Expiry Review Investigations under the Special Import Measures Act. Any information submitted to the Commissioner by interested persons concerning this investigation is deemed to be public information unless clearly designated as confidential. Where the submission is confidential, a non-confidential edited version or summary of the submission must also be provided which will be disclosed to interested parties upon request.
With respect to the Commissioner's investigation, the schedule specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies to the expiry review questionnaires, the date on which the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (CCRA) exhibits will be available to parties to the proceeding, the date on which the administrative record will be closed and the dates for the filing of submissions by parties in the proceeding. The Tribunal, on behalf of the Commissioner, has sent expiry review questionnaires to foreign producers and exporters, importers and domestic producers. Other persons having an interest in the Commissioner's investigation may also provide submissions to the Commissioner. These must be received by January 5, 2001, in order to be given consideration by the Commissioner.
Tribunal's Inquiry
Should the Commissioner determine that the expiry of the order in respect of any goods is likely to result in a continuation or resumption of dumping, the Tribunal will conduct its inquiry, pursuant to the provisions of SIMA and its Draft Guideline on Expiry Reviews, to determine if there is a likelihood of injury or retardation. The schedule for the Tribunal's inquiry specifies, among other things, the date for the filing of replies by the domestic producers to Part E of the expiry review questionnaire and the Tribunal's market characteristics questionnaires, the date on which information on the record will be made available by the Tribunal to interested parties and counsel that have filed notices of participation and the dates for the filing of submissions by interested parties.
Under section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must submit to the Tribunal, at the time the information is provided, a statement designating the information as confidential, together with an explanation as to why the information is designated as confidential. Furthermore, the person must submit a non-confidential edited version or non-confidential summary of the information designated as confidential or a statement indicating why such an edited version or summary cannot be made.
Public Hearing
The Tribunal will hold a public hearing relating to this expiry review in the Tribunal Hearing Room, 18th floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario, commencing on May 28, 2001, at 9:30 a.m., to hear evidence and representations by interested parties.
Each interested person or government wishing to participate at the hearing as a party must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before March 30, 2001. Each counsel who intends to represent a party at the hearing must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before March 30, 2001.
To allow the Tribunal to determine whether simultaneous interpretation will be required for the hearing, each interested person or government filing a notice of participation and each counsel filing a notice of representation must advise the Secretary, at the same time that they file the notice, whether they and their witnesses will be using English or French or both languages at the hearing.
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules govern these proceedings.
In order to observe and understand production processes, the Tribunal, accompanied by its staff, may conduct plant visits.
Communication
Written submissions, correspondence or requests for information regarding the Commissioner's investigation should be addressed to: Louis Nadon, Senior Program Officer, Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate, Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, Sir Richard Scott Building, 16th Floor, 191 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5, (613) 954-7410 (Telephone), (613) 954-3750 (Facsimile).
A copy of the Commissioner's investigation schedule and the expiry review investigation guidelines are available on the CCRA's Web site at www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/customs/business/ sima/index-eng.html.
Written submissions, correspondence or requests for information regarding the Tribunal's inquiry should be addressed to: The Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (Telephone), (613) 990-2439 (Facsimile).
Written and oral communications to the CCRA and the Tribunal may be made in English or in French.
Ottawa, November 10, 2000
MICHEL P. GRANGER
Secretary
[48-1-o]
INQUIRY
Architect and Engineering Services
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) has received a complaint from Siemens Westinghouse Incorporated, of Bedford, Nova Scotia, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. W8483-6-EFAA) by the Department of Public Works and Government Services on behalf of the Department of National Defence. The solicitation is for the acquisition of in-service support (class design agency and class technical data agency services) for the Halifax and Iroquois class ships. Pursuant to subsection 30.13(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act and subsection 7(2) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations, notice is hereby given that the Tribunal has decided to conduct an inquiry (File No. PR-2000-039) into this complaint.
It is alleged that the procurement process is being conducted in a discriminatory manner in violation of the Agreement on Internal Trade.
Further information may be obtained from: The Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, (613) 993-3595 (Telephone), (613) 990-2439 (Facsimile).
Ottawa, November 14, 2000
MICHEL P. GRANGER
Secretary
[48-1-o]
NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES
The following notices are abridged versions of the Commission's original notices bearing the same number. The original notices contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including additional locations and addresses where the complete files may be examined. The relevant material, including the notices and applications, is available for viewing during normal business hours at the following offices of the Commission:
— Central Building, Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, 1 Promenade du Portage, Ground Floor, Hull, Quebec K1A 0N2, (819) 997-2429 (Telephone), 994-0423 (TDD), (819) 994-0218 (Facsimile);
— Bank of Commerce Building, Suite 1007, 1809 Barrington Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K8, (902) 426-7997 (Telephone), 426-6997 (TDD), (902) 426-2721 (Facsimile);
— Kensington Building, Suite 1810, 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3, (204) 983-6306 (Telephone), 983-8274 (TDD), (204) 983-6317 (Facsimile);
— 530-580 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6, (604) 666-2111 (Telephone), 666-0778 (TDD), (604) 666-8322 (Facsimile);
— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 405 De Maisonneuve Boulevard E, 2nd Floor, Suite B2300, Montréal, Quebec H2L 4J5, (514) 283-6607 (Telephone), 283-8316 (TDD), (514) 283-3689 (Facsimile);
— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, 55 St. Clair Avenue E, Suite 624, Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2, (416) 952-9096 (Telephone), (416) 954-6343 (Facsimile);
— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, Cornwall Professional Building, Room 103, 2125 11th Avenue, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3, (306) 780-3422 (Telephone), (306) 780-3319 (Facsimile);
— C.R.T.C. Documentation Centre, Scotia Place Tower Two, 19th Floor, Suite 1909, 10060 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3R8, (780) 495-3224 (Telephone), (780) 495-3214 (Facsimile).
Interventions must be filed with the Secretary General, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2, together with proof that a true copy of the intervention has been served upon the applicant, on or before the deadline given in the notice.
Secretary General
DECISIONS
The complete text of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.
2000-438 November 14, 2000
CHUM Limited and 3661458 Canada Inc., partners in a general partnership known
as Pulse 24 Inc.
Across Canada
Approved, by majority vote — Request to allow Cable Pulse 24 to sell local adertising in the Toronto market.
2000-439 November 16, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Placentia, Newfoundland
Approved — Decrease of the effective radiated power of CBNT-2 Placentia from 11 000 watts to 10 600 watts.
2000-440 November 16, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Port-au-Port, Newfoundland
Approved — Increase in the effective radiated power of CBFNT Port-au-Port from 14 000 watts to 15 000 watts.
2000-441 November 16, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Stephenville, Newfoundland
Approved — Increase of the effective radiated power of CBYT-1 Stephenville from 11 600 watts to 12 010 watts.
2000-442 November 16, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
St. John's, Newfoundland
Approved — Addition of a second transmitter at St. John's.
2000-443 November 16, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Liverpool, Nova Scotia
Approved — Increase of the effective radiated power of CBHT-1 Liverpool from 970 watts to 1 127 watts.
2000-444 November 16, 2000
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Edmundston, New Brunswick
Approved — Increase of the effective radiated power of CBAFT-2 Edmundston from 8 500 watts to 19 500 watts.
[48-1-o]
PUBLIC HEARING 2000-10
The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on December 20, 2000, at 9 a.m. (Issue No. 1), at the Commission Headquarters, 1 Promenade du Portage, Hull, Quebec, to consider the following:
Atlantic and Quebec Region
1. Todd Foss, on behalf of a company to be incorporated and to be known as
Mix FM
Lewisporte, Newfoundland
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language low-power developmental FM community radio programming undertaking at Lewisporte.
Ontario Region
2. Janice Taylor, on behalf of a society to be incorporated
Georgina Island, Ontario
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English- and Native-language FM (type B) radio programming undertaking at Georgina Island.
3. 1311831 Ontario Limited
Timmins, Ontario
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language, low-power FM radio programming undertaking at Timmins.
Western Canada and Territories Region
4. Corus Radio Company
Red Deer, Alberta
For a broadcasting licence to carry on an English-language FM radio programming undertaking at Red Deer.
Deadline for intervention: December 5, 2000
November 10, 2000
[48-1-o]
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-152-1
Further to its Public Notice CRTC 2000-152 dated November 8, 2000, the Commission announces that the licensee coordinates have been changed:
Item 3
Look Communications Inc.
Barrie, Belleville, etc., Ontario
Montréal and surrounding areas, Québec, and surrounding areas, etc., Quebec
Western Quebec and Eastern Ontario, including the National Capital Region
Deadline for intervention: December 14, 2000
November 16, 2000
[48-1-o]
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-156
New Licence Form for Campus Radio Stations
The Commission has revised the licence form for campus radio stations. The conditions of licence generally applicable to all such stations will appear on the licence form. These conditions are shown in the appendix to the public notice.
November 16, 2000
[48-1-o]
PUBLIC NOTICE 2000-157
New Licence Form for Community Radio Stations
The Commission has revised the licence form for community radio stations. The conditions of licence generally applicable to all such stations will now appear on the licence form. These conditions are shown in the appendix to the public notice.
November 16, 2000
[48-1-o]
COMPETITION ACT
Application for an Order
Notice is hereby given that on November 10, 2000, an application under sections 92 and 105 of the Competition Act (Act), R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, was filed with the undersigned at the Competition Tribunal by the Commissioner of Competition under the Competition Act, in the matter of the proposed merger between Quebecor Inc. and Le Groupe Vidéotron ltée whereby Quebecor Inc. will acquire, inter alia, indirect control of TVA Group Inc., a subsidiary of Le Groupe Vidéotron ltée. The respondent in this application is Quebecor Inc.
Particulars of the order sought:
(a) an order pursuant to sections 92 and 105 of the Act in the form of the draft consent order attached to the notice of application; and
(b) such further or other order as the applicant and the respondent, on consent, may advise and the Tribunal considers appropriate.
Notice is hereby given that any requests for leave to intervene and any comments in this matter must be filed with the Registrar on or before December 18, 2000.
The notice of application and accompanying documents may be examined at the Registry of the Tribunal or a copy may be obtained on the Competition Tribunal's Web site at http://www. ct-tc.gc.ca. Requests for information regarding this application or the procedures of the Tribunal should be addressed to the Deputy Registrar, Competition Tribunal, Royal Bank Centre, 90 Sparks Street, Suite 600, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B4, (613) 957-3172.
November 10, 2000
MONIQUE SÉGUIN
Registrar
[48-1-o]
NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).